Yes, school is starting soon. It begins, at least in our area, with registration. Registration is where the school district convinces everyone that they need to come in at various different times and dates for various class levels to do all kinds of paperwork to sign their kids up for school. This probably wouldn’t be that big of a problem, except every individual school in the district insists on doing things their own way. Plus, their own way usually means a circus of staff and volunteers completely unprepared and disorganized trying to herd a bunch of parents and kids through the registration process. Combine that with the probability that no one thought to turn on the AC ahead of time in 100 degree heat, and you’ve got a recipe for disaster.

I’ve got a few suggestions for making registration less of a nightmare:

  • Use technology, for Pete’s sake! Publish all the forms online, and encourage parents to print and fill them out ahead of time. “If you have your forms filled out, go to the express line!”
  • Even better, give parents the ability to fill out AND submit their forms online. This would save a LOT of time spent by staff or volunteers entering all the registration data back into the computer. It would also save a lot of paper.
  • Move registration closer to the start of school, possibly to the day before or even the first day. Most of the teachers don’t even attempt to start teaching on the first few days because of all the last-minute stuff going on, so why not just work registration into those first days?
  • Don’t use volunteers. It’s difficult to have quality control when there’s no real accountability.

Now that registration is over, next comes the “meet the teacher” days. This is another seemingly random scheduling of times and dates for kids to come up to the school to spend an hour or so scoping out their new classrooms and teachers. I think the general concept here is to make the first day of school less traumatic for the kids. Most parents these days wouldn’t think twice about dropping their kids off at daycare or pre-school not knowing whether there will be a new face on the staff. Most wouldn’t be a bit concerned about the possibility of their kids having a substitute teacher who they had never met before. Most, as sad as this is, could care less about what’s going on at the school as long as the kids is out of their hair. Also, does the 1 to 1 1/2 hour of “meet the teacher” a week before school starts really give the kids any better familiarity with the teacher or the classroom? Some thoughts:

  • If you’re one of the fairly rare parents who actually give a you-know-what about what’s going on up at the school, you’ve probably already scouted out the available teachers, checked with other caring parents to know which ones are the best, and have connived and wheedled the principal into moving your kid into their classroom.
  • If you’ve got a fairly young child, you’re probably already planning on walking them in the first day to make sure they figure out where to go and what to do.
  • Again, if you’re a parent that pays attention, you’re checking in with your teachers throughout the year to make sure everything is fine. Teachers are so used to parents that don’t really care as long as their kid isn’t the one burning the place down that they’re pleasantly surprised when a parent actually wants to – honestly – know how their kid is doing and what they can do to help.

Along with the start of school comes the infamous school supply list. On the grade school level, the lists are pretty clear-cut, at least in that they are usually already created and distributed ahead of time. If you’re (see above) conniving to move your kid into a better classroom, you can cause headaches with not knowing ahead of time which supply list you’ll need to use. Once you get into higher grades where the schedules involve multiple teachers and elective classes, it gets to be a mess. Each teacher/class combination has it’s own requirements, and trying to put together a list from all the variations can be a mess.

At the schools in our area, the supply lists tend to move outside the realm of what you’d think your kid would need for school. Our teachers demand things like Clorox wipes, Ziploc bags, Kleenex, dry-erase markers, and ink pens (at the elementary level). Obviously these are not school supplies. They are general building supplies or teacher supplies that have been gradually pushed off onto the parents. Many things have gradually been pushed off on parents, either directly or through PTA fundraising, effectively moving school expenses off of the official school budget, while continuing to demand tax hikes to cover expenses – but that’s another article when I have several hours to rant.

Suggestions for school supplies:

  • I’ve talked to teachers at other schools that are given a set budget for supplies for their classroom, and are expected to go out and purchase what they need.  To me that’s a pretty good idea, but I’d like to expand on it. Have each teacher submit their list of needed supplies. Review the supply lists and add them to a master requisition list. Put the list up for bid by the local business supply stores. Put all the supplies in a supply room and check them out as needed, based on the initial lists submitted by the teachers. If there are extras, they can carry over into the next year. There is the potential for a large savings by purchasing all these supplies in bulk. The retail outlets probably wouldn’t like it, but what they like really isn’t a concern for the schools.
  • Again, use technology! If you’re going to have the parents buy the supplies, which (see above) isn’t my first choice, at least have the sense to get the lists online so parents can select all the different teachers and classes their kids are in and get one big master list to use when shopping. It would make the process much less painful if parents weren’t juggling several lists while trying to find supplies in an aisle jammed full of other frustrated parents.

Finally, book fees. Book fees keep on climbing year after year. Our kids averaged around $80 for each, with some high-school classes bringing one up to $120. That’s just outrageous, especially when you realize that each kid is not assigned a book for each class. Maybe that’s why they don’t call it book rental anymore? As I understand it, there are enough books for each teacher/subject combination. Simply put, if Mr. Smith teaches 3 periods of Algebra 1 and there are a maximum of 25 kids in each of the 3 periods, they have maybe 30 Algebra 1 books in that classroom. If a kid needs to take a book home, they can, but they need to check it out sometime after the last period of Algebra 1 for the day and check it back in before the first period of Algebra 1 the next day. So, that $80-120 book fee doesn’t pay for your kid to use those books during the school year, but actually for 1 hour per day during the school year. When I went to school 20-30 years ago, we paid a lot less and I had those books in my locker when I needed them.

In my opinion, it’s another way of shuffling what used to be a school expense off onto the parents and out of the school budget, making room there for other things. I suggest that book fees should be eliminated and moved back into the general school operating budget.

Overall, these are things that would be very popular with parents, and parents are the ones paying the school’s bills in the form of property taxes. If schools want more credibility with parents, and want to convince the public to trust them when they say they need more funding, they should make some effort like those listed here to show that they really want to make things better.

H/T Illinois Review:

Here’s a study about how home-school kids fare in college.  I wasn’t surprised to see that they consistently have higher grades, score higher on standardized tests, and graduate in higher rates.  That, and it costs significantly less to home-school a child than what the public schools spend.

Sam Blumenfeld at The New American gives a history of the origins of the public education system in the USA.

Here’s yet another example of what happens when liberals are allowed to run things.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/index.php/culture/education/3816-rhode-island-school-bans-toy-solder-cap

Tiny plastic toy soldiers with guns.  Hmm, what is it about toy soldiers that liberals don’t like?  Well, they hate the military, so the idea of a soldier is offensive to them.  They hate guns, and soldiers carry guns, so that’s strike two.  And lastly, the whole point of the kid’s hat was patriotism and the honoring of the military.  Liberals can’t stand patriotism, since it implies that the USA is superior to other countries.

This insanity has to stop.  Vote these loons out of office and let’s return our country to greatness!

This is great! I happened across this, and I wish Illinois had this.  Then those lunatics who took buses to Springfield to ask for more taxes could all put their money where their mouth is and pay extra!

We need this guy in Illinois – bad.  This state is hemorrhaging money and our current Governor and all his Democrat and RINO lackeys won’t do anything about it.  This guy is going to save New Jersey by making the hard choices.

H/T to Aaron for pointing me to this article.  It’s a great analysis of the life of nerds in school.  He puts into words the things that many of us “nerds” experienced in school.  I didn’t understand at the time, but I think he’s absolutely right: I cared more about being smart, with my eyes set on life AFTER school, than I did about popularity.  The people who cared more about being popular worked hard at that instead.

He also does a good job of describing and explaining the often shocking cruelty seen amongst kids in school.  It’s a long read, but well worth it.

I wonder, what exactly makes the Illinois legislature think they know best how to run a school?  Here we have a proposal to give schools some flexibility to give them some options to try and save money. (Original article at the Chicago Tribune).  A school superintendent asked to have the option of moving to a 4-day week to save bus fuel and utilities costs.

The idea is shot down by Sen. Meeks, head of the Senate Education Committee.  From what I’ve been able to find, Meeks’ only experience with education is as a student.  I’m not sure why he would know better how to run a school than the local school administration or school board.  He also made this gem of a joke:

“Kids in Chicago need to go to school eight days a week,”

Seems a little condescending towards Chicago’s youth, if you ask me.

The other notable objectors to the bill: the Illinois Federation of Teachers, the Chicago Teachers Union, and Chicago Mayor Richard Daley. The Union opposition is hardly a surprise, as they resist any local control of schools in fear that it may develop into less union control.  Daley’s a Democrat, so it’s also no surprise that he’d resist anything that would lessen the state government’s power.

The sad fact is that most of the people we put in charge are either career politicians or lawyer/politicians.  I make a point of looking up the biographies of anyone I post about, and it’s remarkable how rarely those bios note that someone had a regular job before they got involved in politics.  They don’t know any more about running a school district than I do.  That’s why we hire superintendents for insane amounts of money: they supposedly know what they are doing.

The reasons the unions and others objected?  They claimed it would minimize time kids spend in school, even though the bill stated the remaining 4 days would be longer, resulting in the same time spent.  The other reason was that it would cost parents more money to have their kids watched for that day, and that more kids would then be left unsupervised.  Apparently that’s a problem in Chicago.

Don’t forget, the bill didn’t MAKE schools switch to 4 days, it would just have allowed them to do so if they chose.  In our local school district, that would have meant a proposal before the local school board.  The people of the district would have made their opinions known, and (for the most part) the school board would have taken those opinions into consideration to make their decision.  In other words, the people of the school district’s elected representatives on the school board would have made the decision – not the state government controlled by Chicago democrats.

It’s time to start voting out those who would control every aspect of our lives.

Hmm.  Yet another article on Quincynews.org about our illustrious schol board.  Yet another chance to point out how incompetent everyone thinks Bud Niekamp is, and another chance for a flurry of opinions about whether we should raise taxes to give more money to the schools.  Someone mentioned Bob having a macro for a certain sentence – I think he could use a template for the entire article every time the board meets.

1) Bud tries to do something that EVERYONE knows he can’t do, and one of the multitude of attorneys present stops him.

2) A vote is taken to tax/collect/spend money, and Bud votes no, for a 6-1 Yes vote.  <Everyone snickers at Bud here – he ALWAYS votes NO because he’s nutty that way>

3) Random comments and/or statements regarding how it’s all about the students, blah blah blah.  Lots of posturing and strutting going on.

I don’t understand why people get so worked up about Bud.  He’s been on the board for years.  He’s going to be re-elected.  He’s always going to be the NO note against spending and taxes.  For years you’ve been getting exactly what you wanted – 6-1 votes to raise this tax or that levy to increase the school budget.  Bud votes NO, his people are happy because he did what they wanted him to.  Bud’s NO vote even makes it appear to outsiders that these things are deliberated rather than being a “done deal”.

You (that is, everyone who is actively anti-Bud), had a sweet deal and you blew it.  Instead of letting him just keep doing his thing, someone got it in their head to mess with the status quo.  Next thing you know, the dust clears and Bud’s sitting in the president’s seat.  Now he’s not just an annoyance, he’s an annoyance who can actually make things happen.  Instead of just licking your wounds and waiting out his term, you decide to haul in the lawyers to try and force him out.  Try to make him quit.  Try to embarrass him.

You must not have been paying attention all these years.  If Bud was the quitting type, he wouldn’t have the reputation he has today.  He’s going to cling to that chair and make things as difficult as he can.

 

It’s been a lot of years since I was in grade school, and I’ll be the first to admit my memory isn’t what it once was, but I don’t remember this “daily snack” thing that the gradeschools do here.  I think I remember getting a carton of milk half-way through the morning – maybe that was our snack.

Anyway, for those who aren’t in the know, what happens is this.  Starting at the beginning of the year, the school “requests” that you send in a month’s worth of snacks for the upcoming month.  They also send out their list of suggested healthy snacks.  Of course, my idea of healthy doesn’t match up well with theirs, mainly because their healthy needs to also be easy, convenient, pre-packaged and not refrigerated.  Can’t expect bananas and apples to last a month, right?  So, the list tends to point towards things like fruit-rollups, fruit bars, and many other little bundles of high-fructose corn syrup goodness.

So, at the beginning of the month you grab a box of these goodies at the grocery store and send them to school with your kid.  End of the story, right?  Well, no.  When your kid turns in his goodies to the teacher, she takes his box and all the other boxes and mixes them together in a big box-o-goodies.  Each day the kids all walk by and grab anything they want from the box.  Anyone with kids can identify the problems with this:

  • All the really good stuff will be gone right away, then the okay stuff through the middle of the month, and then the stuff noone likes will all be left to the end of the month.
  • Not all parents will contribute.  No matter how much peer pressure or shame you bring down, some people are just bad parents and don’t play nice.  Don’t give me any crap about people not being able to afford it – everyone seems to have enough money for smokes.
  • Some people will eventually cut back on the quality of their snacks if they notice that others are being cheap.  “Why pay extra for name-brand stuff when my kid isn’t going to get any?”

So what’s the solution?  If snacks are necessary, the school should be buying them.  That cures all 3 problems.  The only problem left is how to fund the purchase, and I think there should be plenty of money left over from the “book rental” fees to buy a bunch of snacks.

© 2010 The Baughers Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha